Quality metric-biased region-of-interest coding for video telephony

ABSTRACT

The disclosure is directed to techniques for region-of-interest (ROI) coding for video telephony (VT). The disclosed techniques include a technique for generation of a quality metric for ROI video, which jointly considers a user&#39;s degree of interest in the ROI, ROI video fidelity, and ROI perceptual quality in evaluating the quality of an encoded video sequence. The quality metric may be used to bias ROI coding and, in particular, the allocation of coding bits between ROI and non-ROI areas of a video frame.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.60/658,008, filed Mar. 1, 2005.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The disclosure relates to digital video encoding and, more particularly,techniques for encoding region-of-interest (ROI) information for videotelephony (VT) applications.

BACKGROUND

A number of different video encoding standards have been established forencoding digital video sequences. The Moving Picture Experts Group(MPEG), for example, has developed a number of standards includingMPEG-1, MPEG-2 and MPEG-4. Other examples include the InternationalTelecommunication Union (ITU) H.263 standard, and the emerging ITU H.264standard. These video encoding standards generally support improvedtransmission efficiency of video sequences by encoding data in acompressed manner.

Video telephony (VT) permits users to share video and audio informationto support applications such as videoconferencing. Exemplary videotelephony standards include those defined by the Session InitiationProtocol (SIP), the ITU H.323 standard, and the ITU H.324 standard. In aVT system, users may send and receive video information, only receivevideo information, or only send video information. A recipient generallyviews received video information in the form in which it is transmittedfrom a sender.

Preferential encoding of a selected portion of the video information hasbeen proposed. For example, a sender may specify a region-of-interest(ROI) to be encoded with higher quality for transmission to a recipient.The sender may wish to emphasize the ROI to a remote recipient. Atypical example of an ROI is a human face, although a sender may wish tofocus attention on other objects within a video scene. With preferentialencoding of the ROI, a recipient is able to view the ROI more clearlythan non-ROI regions.

SUMMARY

The disclosure is directed to techniques for region-of-interest (ROI)coding for video telephony (VT). The disclosed techniques include atechnique for adaptive skipping of a non-ROI area of a video frame toconserve encoding bits for allocation to the ROI. The disclosedtechniques also include a technique for allocation of bits to the ROIusing weighted bit allocation models at the macroblock (MB) level withinthe ρ domain. In addition, the disclosed techniques include a techniquefor generation of a quality metric for ROI video, which jointlyconsiders a user's degree of interest in the ROI, ROI video fidelity,and ROI perceptual quality in evaluating the quality of an encoded videosequence.

The non-ROI skipping technique serves to enhance image quality of theROI without significantly degrading the image quality of the non-ROIregion. In particular, the non-ROI skipping technique can conservenon-ROI bits to provide additional bits for allocation to the ROI. Thequality metric may be applied to bias the bit allocation technique toenhance subjective image quality in the encoded video scene. Bitallocation in the ρ domain can provide more accurate and consistentcontrol of ROI quantization for enhanced visual quality. The non-ROIskipping, ρ domain bit allocation, and quality metric can be usedjointly or separately to achieve effective control of ROI and non-ROIencoding.

In one embodiment, the disclosure provides a method comprisinggenerating a quality metric for an encoded video frame containing aregion of interest based on video fidelity of a preceding frame,perceptual quality of the preceding frame, and user preference in theregion of interest.

In another embodiment, the disclosure provides a device comprising avideo encoder that encodes a video frame containing a region ofinterest, and a quality metric calculator that generates a qualitymetric for the video frame based on video fidelity of a preceding frame,perceptual quality of a preceding frame, and user preference in theregion of interest.

In a further embodiment, the disclosure provides a method comprisingobtaining a definition of a region of interest within a video frame,obtaining a frame budget defining a number of encoding bits availablefor the frame, and allocating rho domain values to macroblocks withinthe frame based on the frame budget and a weighting between macroblockswithin the region of interest and macroblocks within areas of the videoframe that are not within the region of interest.

In an additional embodiment, the disclosure provides a device comprisinga region of interest mapper that generates a definition of a region ofinterest within a video frame, a frame-level rate controller thatgenerates a frame budget defining a number of encoding bits availablefor the frame, and a bit allocation module that allocates rho domainvalues to macroblocks within the frame based on the frame budget and aweighting between macroblocks within the region of interest andmacroblocks within areas of the video frame that are not within theregion of interest.

In another embodiment, the disclosure provides a method comprisinggrouping successive frames into a frame unit, encoding regions ofinterest within the respective frames in the frame unit, and skippingencoding of areas that are not within a respective region of interestfor at least one of the frames in the frame unit.

In a further embodiment, the disclosure provides a device comprising aregion-of-interest mapper that generates a definition of regions ofinterests within video frames, a video encoder that encodes the videoframes, and a skipping module that groups grouping successive framesinto a frame unit, directs the video encoder to encode regions ofinterest within the respective frames in the frame unit, and directs thevideo encoder to skip encoding of areas that are not within a respectiveregion of interest for at least one of the frames in the frame unit.

The techniques described herein may be implemented in hardware,software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented insoftware, the techniques may be realized in part by a computer readablemedium comprising program code containing instructions that, whenexecuted, performs one or more of the methods described herein.

The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanyingdrawings and the description below. Other features, objects, andadvantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and fromthe claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a video encoding and decodingsystem incorporating ROI-enabled video encoder-decoders (CODECs).

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating definition of an ROI within a videoscene presented on a display associated with a wireless communicationdevice.

FIGS. 3A and 3B are diagrams illustrating ROI and non-ROI areas of thevideo scene depicted in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a video communication deviceincorporating an ROI-enabled encoder with a non-ROI skipping module, anROI ρ domain bit allocation module, and an ROI weights calculator.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an ROI quality metric calculator.

FIG. 6 is a diagram further illustrating a wireless communication deviceincorporating an ROI user preference input device for ROI quality metriccalculation.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating use of an ROI quality metriccalculator to analyze a video sequence for optimization of codingparameters applied by a video encoder.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating use of an ROI quality metriccalculator to analyze encoded video for adjustment of coding parametersapplied by a video encoder.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating ROI quality metric calculation forencoded video.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating ROI quality metric calculationfor a video sequence.

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram illustrating ROI ρ domain bit allocation.

FIG. 12 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of encodingtechniques using weighted bit allocation models and an optimal solution.

FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating a technique for non-ROI skipping.

FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating grouping of successive frames intoframe units to support non-ROI skipping.

FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating encoding of successive ROI areas witha common non-ROI area to support non-ROI skipping.

FIG. 16 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.9.

FIG. 17 is a graph comparing overall video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.9.

FIG. 18 is a graph comparing ROI video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.9.

FIG. 19 is a graph comparing non-ROI video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.9.

FIG. 20 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.7.

FIG. 21 is a graph comparing overall video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.7.

FIG. 22 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.5.

FIG. 23 is a graph comparing overall video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using standard bit allocation, weighted bit allocation, andbackground skipping with a user preference factor α=0.5.

FIG. 24 is a graph comparing perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using standard frame skipping and non-ROI skipping at varioususer preference factor values.

FIG. 25 is a graph comparing perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques when non-ROI skipping is on and off.

FIG. 26 is a graph illustrating distortion caused by non-ROI skippingover an exemplary video sequence.

FIG. 27 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using non-ROI skipping, no non-ROI skipping, and adaptivenon-ROI skipping.

FIG. 28 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques for an exemplaryvideo sequence over a range of encoding rates.

FIG. 29 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps).

FIG. 30 is a graph comparing overall video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps).

FIG. 31 is a graph comparing ROI video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps).

FIG. 32 is a graph comparing non-ROI video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps).

FIG. 33 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques for another exemplaryvideo sequence over a range of encoding rates.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a video encoding and decodingsystem 10 incorporating ROI-enabled video encoder-decoders (CODECs). Asshown in FIG. 1, system 10 includes a first video communication device12 and a second video communication device 14. Communication devices 12,14 are connected by a transmission channel 16. Transmission channel 16may be a wired or wireless communication medium. System 10 supportstwo-way video transmission between video communication devices 12, 14for video telephony. Devices 12, 14 may operate in a substantiallysymmetrical manner. In some embodiments, however, one or both videocommunication devices 12, 14 may be configured for only one-waycommunication to support ROI-enabled video streaming.

One or both of video communication devices 12, 14 may be configured toapply techniques for ROI coding for video telephony (VT), as describedherein. The ROI coding techniques including adaptive skipping of anon-ROI region to conserve encoding bits for allocation to the ROI,allocation of bits to the ROI using weighted bit allocation models atthe video block level, e.g., macroblock (MB), level within the ρ domain,and generation of an ROI video quality metric for ROI video, whichjointly considers a user's degree of interest in the ROI, ROI videofidelity, and ROI perceptual quality in evaluating the quality of anencoded video sequence. The ρ (rho) parameter represents the number ofnon-zero AC coefficients in a video block, such as an MB. Rate controlin the ρ domain tends to be more accurate than rate control in the QPdomain. The non-ROI skipping, ρ domain bit allocation, and qualitymetric can be used jointly or separately to achieve effective control ofROI and non-ROI encoding.

A macroblock is a video block that forms part of a frame. The size ofthe MB may be 16 by 16 pixels. However, other MB sizes are possible.Macroblocks will be described herein for purposes of illustration, withthe understanding that macroblocks or other video blocks may have avariety of different sizes.

For two-way applications, reciprocal encoding, decoding, multiplexing(MUX) and demultiplexing (DEMUX) components may be provided on oppositeends of channel 16. In the example of FIG. 1, video communication device12 includes MUX/DEMUX component 18, ROI-enabled video CODEC 20 and audioCODEC 22. Similarly, video communication device 14 includes MUX/DEMUXcomponent 26, ROI-enabled video CODEC 28 and audio CODEC 30.

System 10 may support video telephony according to the Session InitiatedProtocol (SIP), ITU H.323 standard, ITU H.324 standard, or otherstandards. Each video CODEC 20, 28 generates encoded video dataaccording to a video compression standard, such as MPEG-2, MPEG-4, ITUH.263, or ITU H.264. As further shown in FIG. 1, video CODECs 20, 28 maybe integrated with respective audio CODECs 22, 30, and includeappropriate MUX/DEMUX components 18, 26 to handle audio and videoportions of a data stream. The audio portion may carry voice or otheraudio content. The MUX-DEMUX units 18, 26 may conform to the ITU H.223multiplexer protocol, or other protocols such as the user datagramprotocol (UDP).

Each ROI-enabled video CODEC 20, 28 may be capable of processing ROIinformation provided locally by a local user of the respective videocommunication device 12, 14 or ROI information provided remotely from aremote user of the other video communication device 12, 14. For example,a local user of video communication device 12 may specify an ROI in“near-end” video generated locally by video communication device 12 toemphasize a region of the transmitted video to a remote user of device14. Conversely, a local user of video communication device 12 mayspecify an ROI in “far-end” video generated remotely by videocommunication device 14, and communicate the ROI to the remote videocommunication device. In this case, the user of video communicationdevice 12 remotely controls preferential encoding of the ROI by videocommunication device 14, e.g., to more clearly view an ROI in the videoreceived from video communication device 14.

Video communication devices 12, 14 may be implemented as wireless mobileterminals or wired terminals equipped for video streaming, videotelephony, or both. To that end, video communication devices 12, 14 mayfurther include appropriate wireless transmitter, receiver, modem, andprocessing electronics to support wireless communication. Examples ofwireless mobile terminals include mobile radio telephones, mobilepersonal digital assistants (PDAs), mobile computers, or other mobiledevices equipped with wireless communication capabilities and videoencoding and/or decoding capabilities. Examples of wired terminalsinclude desktop computers, video telephones, network appliances, set-topboxes, interactive televisions, or the like. Either video communicationdevice 12, 14 may be configured to send video information, receive videoinformation, or send and receive video information.

For video telephony applications, it is generally desirable that devices12 support both video send and video receive capabilities. However,streaming video applications are also contemplated. In video telephony,and particularly mobile video telephony by wireless communication,bandwidth is a significant concern as extremely low bitrates are oftenrequired. In particular, communication channel 16 may have limitedbandwidth, making the effective real-time transmission of quality videosequences over channel 16 very challenging. Communication channel 16,for example, may be a wireless communication link with limited bandwidthdue to physical constraints in channel 16, or possiblyquality-of-service (QoS) limitations or bandwidth allocation constraintsimposed by the provider of communication channel 16.

Accordingly, selective allocation of additional encoding bits to an ROI,stronger error protection, or other preferential encoding steps, canimprove the image quality of a portion of the video while maintainingoverall encoding efficiency. For preferential encoding, additional bitsmay be allocated to the ROI, while a reduced number of bits may beallocated to the non-ROI regions, such as the background in a videoscene. The non-ROI areas will be referred to as “background” areas,although a non-ROI area more generally encompasses any area of a videoscene that does not form part of the ROI. Accordingly, the terms non-ROIand background may be used interchangeably throughout this disclosure torefer to areas that are not within the specified ROI.

In general, system 10 employs techniques for region-of-interest (ROI)processing for video telephony (VT) applications. However, suchtechniques also may be applicable to video streaming applications, asmentioned above. For purposes of illustration, it will be assumed thateach video communication device 12, 14 is capable of operating as both asender and a recipient of video information, and thereby operating as afull participant in a VT session. For video information transmitted fromvideo communication device 12 to video communication device 14, videocommunication device 12 is the sender device and video communicationdevice 14 is the recipient device. Conversely, for video informationtransmitted from video communication device 14 to video communicationdevice 12, video communication device 12 is the recipient device andvideo communication device 14 is the sender device. The techniquesdescribed herein may also be applicable to devices that only send oronly receive such video. When discussing video information to be encodedand transmitted by a local video communication device 12, 14, the videoinformation may be referred to as “near-end” video, as mentioned above.When discussing video information to be encoded by and received from aremote video communication device 12, 14, the video information may bereferred to as “far-end” video.

According to the disclosed techniques, when operating as a recipientdevice, video communication device 12 or 14 defines ROI information forfar-end video information that is received from a sender device. Again,video information that is received from a sender device will be referredto as “far-end” video information in the sense that it is received fromthe other (sender) device situated at the far end of the communicationchannel. Likewise, ROI information defined for video information that isreceived from a sender device will be referred to as “far-end” ROIinformation. Far-end ROI generally refers to a region within the far-endvideo that most interests a receiver of the far-end video. The recipientdevice decodes the far-end video information and presents the decodedfar-end video to a user via a display device. The user selects an ROIwithin a video scene presented by the far-end video. Alternatively, theROI may be automatically defined.

The recipient device generates far-end ROI information based on the ROIselected by the user at the recipient device, and sends the far-end ROIinformation to the sender device so that the sender device can use suchinformation. The far-end ROI information may take the form of an ROImacroblock (MB) map defining the ROI in terms of the MBs that residewithin the ROI. The ROI MB map may flag MBs that are within the ROI witha 1, and MBs outside the ROI with a 0, to readily identify MBs includedin (1) and excluded from (0) the ROI.

Using the far-end ROI information transmitted by the recipient device,the sender device applies preferential encoding to a corresponding ROIwithin the video scene. In particular, additional encoding bits may beallocated to the ROI, while a reduced amount of encoding bits may beallocated to non-ROI regions, thereby improving image quality of theROI. In this manner, the recipient device is able to remotely controlROI encoding of far-end video information by the sender device.

The preferential encoding applies higher quality encoding to the ROIarea than to non-ROI areas of the video scene, e.g., by preferential bitallocation or preferential quantization in the ROI area. Thepreferentially encoded ROI permits the user of the recipient device toview an object or region more clearly. For example, the user of therecipient device may wish to view a face or some other object moreclearly than background regions of a video scene.

When operating as a sender device, video communication device 12 or 14may also define ROI information for video information that istransmitted by the sender device. Again, video information that isgenerated in the sender device will be referred to as “near-end” videoin the sense that it is generated at the near end of the communicationchannel. ROI information generated by the sender device will be referredto as “near-end” ROI information.

Near-end ROI generally refers to a region of the near-end video that asender wants to emphasize to a receiver. Hence, an ROI may be specifiedby a recipient device user as far-end ROI information, or by a senderdevice user as near-end ROI information. The sender device presents thenear-end video to a user via a display device. The user associated withthe sender device selects an ROI within a video scene presented by thenear-end video. The sender device encodes the near-end video using theuser-selected ROI such that the ROI in the near-end video ispreferentially encoded, e.g., with higher quality encoding, relative tonon-ROI areas.

The near-end ROI selected or defined by a local user at the senderdevice allows a user of the sender device to emphasize regions orobjects within the video scene, and thereby direct such regions orobjects to the attention of the recipient device user. Notably, thenear-end ROI selected by the sender device user need not be transmittedto the recipient device. Instead, the sender device uses the selectednear-end ROI information to locally encode the near-end video before itis transmitted to the recipient device. In some embodiments, however,the sender device may send ROI information to the recipient device topermit application of preferential decoding techniques, such as higherquality error correction or post-processing.

If ROI information is provided by both the sender device and therecipient device, the sender device applies the received far-end ROIinformation from the recipient device or the locally generated near-endROI information to encode the near-end video. ROI conflicts may arisebetween the near-end and far-end ROI selections provided by the senderdevice and recipient device. Such conflicts may require resolution, suchas active resolution by a local user or resolution according tospecified access rights and levels. In either case, the sender devicepreferentially encodes the ROI based on near-end ROI informationprovided locally by the sender device or remotely by the recipientdevice.

Given an ROI specified by either a local user or a remote user, thisdisclosure generally focuses on techniques for ROI encoding. Inparticular, this disclosure addresses the manner in which an ROI ispreferentially encoded, in terms of bit allocation between ROI andnon-ROI areas within a video scene. An ROI video quality metric may beapplied to bias a weighted bit allocation between ROI and non-ROI areas.The video quality metric takes into account a user's degree ofpreference, i.e., interest in the ROI, ROI video fidelity, and ROIperceptual quality in evaluating the quality of an encoded videosequence. The weighted bit allocation is applied within the ρ domain. Inaddition, a non-ROI, or “background,” skipping algorithm may be appliedto conserve encoding bits for allocation to the ROI.

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating definition of an ROI within a videoscene 32 presented on a display 34 associated with a wirelesscommunication device 36. In the example of FIG. 2, the ROI is depictedas either a rectangular ROI 38 or a non-rectangular ROI 40.Non-rectangular ROI 40 may have a rounded or irregular shape. In eachcase, ROI 38 or ROI 40 contains the face 42 of a person presented invideo scene 32. FIGS. 3A and 3B are diagrams illustrating ROI 38 andnon-ROI area 43 of the video scene 32 depicted in FIG. 2. The non-ROIarea 43, i.e., the background, is highlighted by shading in FIG. 3B.

ROI 38 or 40 may be defined manually by a user, automatically by device36, or using a combination of manual ROI description by a user andautomatic ROI definition by device 36. Rectangular ROI 38 may beselected by a user. Non-rectangular ROI 40 may be drawn by a user, e.g.,using a stylus and a touchscreen, or selected automatically by device 36using any of a variety of object detection or segmentation techniques.For VT applications, ROI 38 or 40 may encompass a portion of video scene32 that contains the face 42 of a participant in a videoconference. Thesize, shape and position of ROI 38 or 40 may be fixed or adjustable, andmay be defined, described or adjusted in a variety of ways.

ROI 38 or 40 permits a video sender to emphasize individual objectswithin a transmitted video scene 32, such as the face 42 of a person.Conversely, ROI 38 or 40 permits a video recipient to more clearly viewdesired objects within a received video scene 32. In either case, face42 within ROI 38 or 40 is encoded with higher image quality relative tonon-ROI areas such as background regions of video scene 32. In this way,the user is able to more clearly view facial expressions, lip movement,eye movement, and the like.

ROI 38 or 40 may be used, however, to specify objects other than theface. Generally speaking, the ROI in VT applications can be verysubjective and may differ from user to user. The desired ROI alsodepends on how VT is used. In some cases, VT may be used to view andevaluate objects, in contrast to videoconferencing. For example, a usermay wish to focus on a section of a whiteboard containing equations ordrawings, rather than a presenter's face, particularly when thepresenting is facing away from the camera and toward the whiteboard. Insome cases, a video scene may include two or more ROI's, which aredesignated for preferential encoding.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an ROI-enabled video encodingsystem 44 for use in a video communication device 12. As shown in FIG.4, system 44 includes ROI weights calculator 46, ROI ρ domain bitallocation module 48, non-ROI (i.e., background) skipping module 50, ROImacroblock (MB) mapper 52, frame-level rate controller 54,ρ-to-quantization parameter (QP) mapper 56, video encoder 58, anddistortion analyzer 60. In FIG. 4, MUX-DEMUX and audio components areomitted for ease of illustration.

The various components depicted in FIG. 4 may be formed in a variety ofways, as discrete functional modules or as a monolithic module thatencompasses the functionality ascribed to each module. In any event, thevarious components of video encoding system 44 may be realized inhardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. For example,such components may operate as software processes executing on one ormore microprocessors or digital signal processors (DSPs), one or moreapplication specific integrated circuits (ASICs), one or more fieldprogrammable gate arrays (FPGAs), or other equivalent integrated ordiscrete logic circuitry.

In the example of FIG. 4, ROI weights calculator 46 receives userpreference factor α entered by a local user of video communicationdevice 12 or a remote user of video communication device 14. The userpreference α is a perceptual importance factor for the ROI, whichexpresses the importance of visual quality of the ROI form theperspective of the actual user. User preference α quantifies the degreeto which a user values visual quality within the ROI. If the userstrongly values ROI visual quality, a will be higher. If the visualquality of the ROI is less important, a will be lower. Based onpreference α, ROI weights calculator 46 generates a set of weights w_(i)that are applied to ROI ρ domain bit allocation module 48 to bias theweighted bit allocation between non-ROI and ROI areas of a video framebeing encoded by video encoder 58. The weights w_(i) may be designatedfor individual video blocks, such as macroblocks (MBs), within a videoframe. ROI weights calculator 46 receives an ROI MB map from ROI MBmapper 52, and assigns respective weights w_(i) to ROI and non-ROI MBsidentified by ROI MB mapper 52. Macroblocks with higher weights w_(i)will receive a higher number of coding bits.

The ρ domain bit allocation module 48 receives the weights input w_(i)from ROI weights calculator 46, a skipping indication (SKIP ON/OFF) fromnon-ROI background skipping module 50, an ROI MB map from ROI MB mapper52, a rate budget R_(BUDGET) from frame-level rate controller 54, and astandard deviation σ for the encoded MBs from video encoder 58. Thestandard deviation σ may be the standard deviation of the actual residueobtained after motion estimation, and can be the stored residuestatistics from previous frames. The ROI MB map provided by ROI MBmapper 52 identifies the MBs, within a given video frame, that fallwithin the specified ROI. Using the ROI MB map, the ρ domain bitallocation module 48 distinguishes ROI MBs from non-ROI MBs for purposesof preferential bit allocation to the ROI MBs, i.e., using the weightsw_(i) provided by ROI weights calculator 46. Bit allocation module 48generates a ρ parameter for each MB. The ρ parameter represents thenumber of non-zero AC coefficients in an MB. Rate control in the ρdomain tends to be more accurate than rate control in the QP domain.

For purposes of this disclosure, it is assumed that a suitable processfor generation of the ROI MB map is available. For example, the ROImapping process may be based on manual input from a user defining theROI, or automatic definition or detection of the ROI, e.g., usingconventional techniques such as face detection, face segmentation, andtarget tracking with acceptable accuracy. In this disclosure, forpurposes of illustration, head or head-and-shoulder video sequences areconsidered, although the techniques described herein may be applicableto other types of video sequences containing a variety of objects inaddition, or as an alternative, to persons.

Frame-level rate controller 54 generates an allocation of bits toindividual frames within a video sequence. In particular, frame-levelrate controller 54 generates a value R_(BUDGET) that indicates thenumber of bits available for encoding all of the MBs within the presentframe, i.e., both ROI and non-ROI MBs. As further shown in FIG. 4, ρdomain bit allocation module 48 receives a skip indication (SKIP ON/OFF)from non-ROI background skipping module 50, which indicates whether thebackground in the present frame will be encoded or skipped. If thebackground will be skipped, then ρ domain bit allocation module 48 can,in effect, recapture the bits that would otherwise have been allocatedto the non-ROI, and reallocate them to the pool of bits available toencode the ROI. Hence, if skipping is ON in a particular frame, ρ domainbit allocation module 48 has more bits within R_(BUDGET) to allocate tothe ROI. If the background is skipped in a particular frame, backgroundfrom a previously encoded frame may be substituted in its place.Alternatively, the skipped background may be produced by interpolation.

Using the weights w_(i), ROI MB map, R_(BUDGET), SKIP ON/OFF indication,and standard deviation σ, ρ domain bit allocation module 48 generates aρ domain output indicating the ρ budget for each MB. The ρ domain outputis applied to ρ-to-QP mapper 56, which maps the ρ value to acorresponding QP value for each MB. Using the QP values for the MBswithin the frame, video encoder 58 encodes input video to produceencoded video. In addition, skipping module 50 provides a skipindication (SKIP ON/OFF) to video encoder 58 to direct the video encoderto group successive frames into a frame unit, encode ROI areas of theframes, and skip encoding of non-ROI areas for one of the frames withinthe frame unit. Skipping may be adaptive in the sense that skippingmodule 50 may direct video encoder 58 to skip encoding of the non-ROIareas for one of the frames in the frame unit if a distortion valueassociated with a preceding frame unit is less than a threshold value.In this manner, skipping module 50 may apply adaptive skipping based onthe level of distortion in order to maintain visual quality.

The input video may be obtained from a video capture device, such as avideo camera integrated with, or operably coupled to, videocommunication device 12. In some embodiments, for example, the videocapture device may be integrated with a mobile telephone to form aso-called camera phone or video phone. In this manner, video capturedevice 40 may support mobile VT applications. The video may be presentedboth locally on video communication device 12 and, upon transmission, onvideo communication device 14 via a display device, such as a liquidcrystal display (LCD), a plasma screen, or the like, which may beintegrated with, or operably coupled to, video communication device 12or 14.

Distortion analyzer 60 analyzes the encoded video versus the originalinput video. For example, distortion analyzer 60 compares an originalinput video frame F to a reconstructed video frame F′. Distortionanalyzer 60 generates a distortion value D_(NONROI) _(—) _(SKIP) forapplication to non-ROI background skipping module 50. The distortionvalue D_(NONROI) _(—) _(SKIP) indicates whether the non-ROI area of thenext video frame should be skipped or not. Accordingly, for adaptivenon-ROI skipping in a current frame, non-ROI skipping module 50 maygenerally rely on distortion information relating to a preceding frame,or frame unit containing two or more frames.

If the distortion value D_(NONROI) _(—) _(SKIP) exceeds a desiredthreshold, non-ROI background skipping module 50 indicates that thenon-ROI in the next frame should not be skipped. In this case, the ROIand non-ROI areas are both encoded. If the distortion value is less thanthe desired threshold, however, the non-ROI area can be skipped withoutan undue level of distortion. In this case, the non-ROI area encoded forthe previous frame is used in the present frame. As will be described,non-ROI skipping module 50 may group successive frames into frame unitsand direct video encoder 58 to skip encoding of the non-ROI for one ofthe frames, depending on the distortion value D_(NONROI) _(—) _(SKIP)for a preceding fame unit, i.e., a frame unit containing frames thatprecede the frames presently being encoded.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an ROI quality metric calculator61, in accordance with another embodiment of this disclosure. ROIweights calculator 46 of FIG. 4 may form part of ROI quality metriccalculator 61. Accordingly, one product of ROI quality metric calculator46 may be an set of weights w_(i), which may be based on user preferencefactor α, as well video fidelity, spatial quality, and/or temporalquality values. As shown in FIG. 5, ROI quality metric calculator 61receives user preference value a and one or more video distortionvalues. The video distortion values may be divided into ROI values andnon-ROI values, and may include video fidelity values D_(RF), D_(NF),spatial quality values D_(RS), D_(NS), and temporal quality valuesD_(RT), D_(NT). D_(RF) represents the video fidelity within the ROI,while D_(NF) represents the video fidelity within the non-ROI region.D_(RS) represents the spatial quality within the ROI area, while D_(NS)represents the spatial quality within the non-ROI area. D_(RT)represents temporal quality within the ROI area, while D_(NT) representstemporal quality within the non-ROI area. The ROI quality metric jointlyconsiders the users' interest, video fidelity and perceptual quality(spatial, temporal or both) in evaluating the quality of an encodedvideo sequence. In some embodiments, the metric may be used to bias thebit allocation algorithm applied by ρ domain bit allocation module 48 toachieve better subjective visual quality.

Although ROI video coding has been widely studied, the qualitymeasurement for ROI video has not been addressed in sufficient detail.Most quality measurement techniques use peak signal to noise ratio(PSNR) as a distortion measurement to evaluate the quality of ROI andnon-ROI portions of a video frame. An ROI video quality metric is usefulnot only for analysis purposes, but as an input to bias weighted bitallocation techniques (e.g., as applied by bit allocation module 48 ofFIG. 4) toward a subjective visual favorable solution. In general, asdiscussed above, the evaluation of an ROI video quality considers atleast three aspects: users' ROI visual quality interest or preference α,video fidelity of the reconstructed video data, and perceptual quality(spatial, temporal or both) of the reconstructed video data.

The user's preference α directly determines the classification of avideo frame into ROI and non-ROI parts and their associated perceptualimportance factors. In video telephony applications, a speaker's faceregion is a typical ROI because the human being's facial expression isvery complicated and small variation can convey a large quantity ofinformation. For the video fidelity factor, PSNR is a good measurement,which indicates the total amount of distortion of the reconstructedvideo frame compared to the original frame. The reconstructed frame isproduced by decoding the encoded video frame, whereas the original frameis the video frame prior to encoding.

In many cases, video fidelity will be the most important considerationfor video coding, where any improvement might cause better subjectivevisual quality. However, this is not always the case, which is whyperceptual quality factors should also be taken into account in somecases. The perceptual quality considers both spatial errors and temporalerrors. Spatial errors may include the presence of blocking (i.e.,blockiness), ringing artifacts, or both. Temporal errors may include thepresence of temporal flicker, i.e., when the visual qualities of thevideo frame change non-uniformly along the temporal axis. Temporalerrors can result in choppy motion in a video sequence, which isundesirable.

D_(R) and D_(NR) denote the normalized per pixel distortion of the ROIand non-ROI, and α the ROI perceptual importance factor. If it isassumed that the relationship among the aspects mentioned above can besimplified into a linear function in video quality evaluation, then theoverall distortion of the video sequence can be represented as:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{D_{sequence} = {{\alpha\; D_{R}} + {\left( {1 - \alpha} \right)D_{NR}}}} \\{= {\frac{\alpha}{M}\left\lbrack {{\beta{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{M}{D_{RF}\left( {f_{i},{\overset{\sim}{f}}_{i}} \right)}}} + {\gamma{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{M}{D_{RS}\left( {\overset{\sim}{f}}_{i} \right)}}} +} \right.}} \\{\left. {\left( {1 - \beta - \gamma} \right){D_{RT}\left( {{\overset{\sim}{f}}_{1},\ldots\mspace{11mu},{\overset{\sim}{f}}_{M}} \right)}} \right\rbrack +} \\{\frac{\left( {1 - \alpha} \right)}{M}\left\lbrack {{\beta{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{M}{D_{NF}\left( {f_{i},\overset{\sim}{f_{i}}} \right)}}} + {\gamma{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{M}{D_{NS}\left( {\overset{\sim}{f}}_{i} \right)}}} +} \right.} \\{\left. {\left( {1 - \beta - \gamma} \right){D_{NT}\left( {{\overset{\sim}{f}}_{1},\ldots\mspace{11mu},{\overset{\sim}{f}}_{M}} \right)}} \right\rbrack,}\end{matrix} & (1)\end{matrix}$where f_(i) and f _(i) are the ith original and reconstructed frameswithin the M frames in the video sequence, β and γ are weightingfactors, D_(R) and D_(NR) are the total distortion for ROI and non-ROI,D_(RF), D_(RS) and D_(RT) are the normalized errors of ROI in fidelity,spatial perceptual quality and temporal perceptual quality, and D_(NF),D_(NS) and D_(NT) are their counterparts for the non-ROI area. Thevalues α, β, and γ should be assigned real values between 0 and 1. Theresulting quality metric can be used as a cost function to formulate anoptimization problem for the rho parameter in weighted bit allocation,or used for other problems in ROI processing.

In low-bitrate video applications, such as wireless video telephony,blocking (i.e., blockiness) artifacts are a major concern of spatialperceptual quality. This kind of artifact is caused by quantizationwhere most of the high-frequency coefficients are removed, i.e., set tozero. The resulting effect is that the smoothed image blocks make theblock boundaries quite pronounced. At the extreme low bit-rate cases,only DC coefficients will be coded, which makes the decoded imagepiece-wise constant blocks. In this disclosure, the ROI spatial qualityvalue D_(RS) (similar for D_(NS)) is defined as the normalizedblockiness distortion, which may be represented as:

$\begin{matrix}{{{D_{RS}\left( \overset{\sim}{f} \right)} = \frac{{boundaries}{\mspace{11mu}\;}{with}\mspace{14mu}{discontinuities}}{{Number}\mspace{14mu}{of}\mspace{14mu}{boundaries}}},} & (2)\end{matrix}$where boundaries between blocks are checked to see if perceivablediscontinuities exists. A suitable discontinuity detection approach,which checks the sum of the mean squared difference of intensity slopeacross the block boundaries, is described in S. Minami and A. Zakhor,“An optimization approach for removing blocking effects in transformcoding”, IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 74-82, April 1995, the entire content of which is incorporatedherein by reference. The assumption of this approach is that the slopeson both sides of a block boundary should be identical and an abruptchange in slope is probably due to quantization.

In equation (1), the D_(RT) (or D_(NT)) value is defined as an assignedscore in the range of [0, 1] based on the variance of D_(RS) (or D_(NS))for all the frames in the video sequence. In this manner, the terms onvideo fidelity, spatial perceptual quality, and temporal perceptualquality are normalized and can be bridged by weighting parameters α, βand γ to form a controllable video quality measurement. The selection ofthese weighting parameters is up to users based on their requirementsand expectations. Again, this measurement may be helpful as an input tobias the bit allocation process toward favoring subjective perception.Consequently, the user may achieve a more visually pleasing result inROI coding.

FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a wireless communication device 36incorporating an ROI user preference input device 62 for ROI qualitymetric calculation. In FIG. 6, wireless communication device 36generally conforms to FIG. 2, but further incorporates input device 62to capture user preference α, which specifies the relative importanceassigned to the ROI and non-ROI portions of video scene 32. In theexample of FIG. 6, input device 62 is shown in the form of a slider barwith a slider 64 that can be moved along the length of the slider bar toindicate the degree of user preference α.

Using input device 62, the user can selectively adjust the userpreference α to influence ROI bit allocation on a dynamic basis, e.g.,by quality metric calculator 61. As the user preference α changes, thebit allocation between ROI and non-ROI portions of the video frame maychange. Although a horizontal slider bar is depicted in FIG. 6, inputdevice 62 may be realized by any of a variety of equivalent input media,such as a vertical slider bar, buttons, dials, drop-down percentagemenus, and the like. Such input media may be manipulated via atouchscreen, or any of a variety of hard keys, soft keys, pointingdevices, or the like.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating use of an ROI quality metriccalculator 61 to analyze a video sequence for optimization of codingparameters applied by an ROI-enabled video encoder 63. As shown in FIG.7, ROI quality metric calculator 61 is applied to analyze distortionvalues for an incoming video sequence before the video sequence isencoded by an ROI-enabled video encoder 63. Hence, ROI quality metriccalculator analyzes distortion values, e.g., as described with referenceto FIG. 5, for a video bitstream. Based on the distortion values and auser preference value α, ROI quality metric calculator generates a setof optimized parameters for use by video encoder 63 in encoding theincoming video sequence. The optimized parameters may include weightsused by a bit allocation module to allocate encoding bits between ROIand non-ROI areas of a video frame, or values for other parameters usedin bit allocation, such as weighting factors β and γ. In a sense, FIG. 7represents an open-loop implementation in which ROI quality metriccalculator 61 analyzes the incoming video stream prior to encoding, butdoes not analyze the encoded video. The quality metric results ingeneration of optimal coding parameters for use by the encoder 63.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating use of an ROI quality metriccalculator 61 to analyze encoded video for adjustment of codingparameters applied by an ROI-enabled video encoder 63. In the example ofFIG. 8, ROI quality metric calculator 61 analyzes distortion valuesassociated with encoded video, as well as a user preference value α, toproduce adjustments to coding parameters used by ROI-enabled videoencoder 63. Hence, ROI quality metric calculator 61 analyzes the videoafter it has been encoded by ROI-enabled video encoder 63, and producesadjustments on a closed loop basis, e.g., to improve the performance ofthe video encoder and the quality of the encoded video. The adjustmentsto the coding parameters may include adjustments to weights used by abit allocation module to allocate encoding bits between ROI and non-ROIareas of a video frame, or values for other parameters used in bitallocation, such as weighting factors β and γ. In the example of FIG. 8,the quality metric is used to interatively encode and evaluate qualityin loop until comparison of the quality metric to a threhsold value issatisfied. In each iteration, the quality metric calculator 61 sends animproved set of coding parameters. Eventually, the iteration stops dueto either satisfaction of a quality metric threshold or convergence ofresults.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating ROI quality metric calculation. Asshown in FIG. 9, given an applicable ROI MB map, ROI quality metriccalculator 46 obtains the ROI user preference α (68) and encodes the ROIand non-ROI portions of the video frame (70). Upon reconstruction of theencoded video frame, distortion analyzer 60 analyzes the previouslyencoded video frame and original video frame to determine the videofidelity D_(RF) and D_(NF) of the ROI and non-ROI portions,respectively, of the preceding video frame. In addition, distortionanalyzer 60 generates ROI and non-ROI perceptual temporal quality valuesD_(RT), D_(NT), respectively, as well as ROI and non-ROI perceptualspatial quality values D_(RS), D_(NS). ROI quality metric calculator 46obtains the video fidelity (72), ROI and non-ROI temporal quality (74)and ROI and non-ROI spatial quality (76) values from distortion analyzer60.

Based on the user preference α, video fidelity, spatial quality andtemporal quality, ROI quality metric calculator 46 determines the ROIquality metric (78). Video fidelity measures the video errors in thereconstructed video frame relative to the original frame, e.g., in termsof color intensity values on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Spatial qualitymeasures spatial errors, such as blocking and ringing artifacts in thereconstructed frame relative to the original frame. Temporal qualitymeasures errors, such as temporal flicker where the frame visualqualities change non-uniformly along the temporal axis.

Notably, the user preference α is a current value applied by the user,whereas the video fidelity, spatial quality and temporal quality arederived from one or more frames that precede the current frame handledby bit allocation module 48. The user preference α may be fixed fromframe-to-frame until such time that the user changes the value. Adefault value may be assigned to user preference factor α if the userhas not specified a value. The ROI quality metric may be applied to biasbit allocation between the ROI and non-ROI of the current video frame(80), as described above with reference to FIG. 5. For example, thequality metric may be used to adjust weights for ROI bit allocation. Insome embodiments, the functionality shown in FIG. 9 may representoperations performed by ROI quality metric calculator 61 in the“closed-loop” example of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram illustrating ROI quality metric calculationfor a video sequence. FIG. 10 corresponds substantially to FIG. 9, butrepresents an embodiment in which the quality metric calculation is maderelative to a video stream before the video stream is encoded.Accordingly, the process of FIG. 10 further includes obtaining the videostream (67). In addition, in contrast to FIG. 9, the video encoding (70)is performed after biasing the ROI/non-ROI bit allocation (80). In someembodiments, the functionality shown in FIG. 9 may represent operationsperformed by ROI quality metric calculator 61 in the “open-loop” exampleof FIG. 7.

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram illustrating ROI ρ domain bit allocation. Asshown in FIG. 11, bit allocation module 48 obtains both an ROIdefinition (82) and rate budget for a frame (84). The ROI definition maytake the form of an ROI MB map that identifies MBs or other video blocksthat fall within the ROI. The rate budget provides the number of bitsavailable for encoding the entire frame, including ROI and non-ROIareas. In addition, bit allocation module 48 obtains the ROI weightsw_(i) (86) from ROI weights calculator 46, which biases bit allocationbetween the ROI and non-ROI. Upon determining the non-ROI skip mode forthe frame (88), i.e., whether skipping is ON or OFF for the frame, bitallocation module 48 obtains statistics for the current frame (89). Thecurrent frame statistics (89) can then be used to make the skipping modedecision for a subsequent frame or frames. The frame statistics mayinclude, for example, a standard deviation of the residue of the framefollowing motion estimation. Alternatively, the frame statistics may beobtained for a previous frame or fames. With the skip mode indication(88), bit allocation module 48 is able to determine whether allavailable bits can be devoted to the ROI (non-ROI frame skipping ON) orwhether the bits must be shared between ROI and non-ROI (non-ROI frameskipping OFF).

Using the ROI definition, frame rate budget, quality metric bias, andnon-ROI skip mode, bit allocation module 48 generates a weighted ρdomain allocation of bits between the ROI MBs and non-ROI MBs (90). Upondetermination of the ρ domain bit allocation, mapper 56 performs a ρ toQP mapping to provide MB QP values (92) for application to video encoder58 (94). Mapper 56 may apply a ρ to QP mapping table, or an equation orfunction that generates a QP for a particular ρ. Video encoder 58 usesthe QP values provided by the bit allocation module 48 and mapper 56 toencode individual ROI and non-ROI MBs within the applicable video frame.The resulting bit allocation may take into account not only theapplicable frame budget, but also the availability of non-ROI skippingand the quality metric associated with a preceding frame or frames inthe video sequence. The operation of bit allocation module 48 will bedescribed in greater detail below.

The bit allocation technique described in this disclosure generallyassumes the availability of sufficient ROI detection or definition, andthe availability of acceptable frame-level rate control. On this basis,the bit allocation technique generally focuses on MB-level rate controlbetween ROI and non-ROI MBs. Most conventional ROI bit allocationalgorithms are based on a weighted version of the ITU H.263+TMN8 model,where a cost function is created and the distortion components onvarious regions in the function are punished differently by using a setof preset weights. Like most of the other video standards, TMN8 uses aQ-domain rate control scheme, which models the rate and distortion withfunctions of QP. However, the bit allocation technique described in thisdisclosure makes use of a ρ domain rate control module, where ρrepresents the number of non-zero quantized AC coefficients in an MB invideo coding. The use of ρ domain bit allocation, as described herein,tends to be more accurate than QP domain rate control and mayeffectively reduce rate fluctuations.

In video coding applications, a typical problem is to minimize adistortion value D_(sequence) with a given bit budget for the videosequence. The optimal solution for this complicated problem relies on anoptimal frame-level rate control algorithm and an optimalmacroblock-level bit allocation scheme. However, for real-timeapplications, such as video telephony, where very limited informationabout future frames is available when coding the current frame, it isnot practical or feasible to pursue an optimal frame-level rate control.Typically, a popular algorithm (“greedy” algorithm) is applied. Thegreedy algorithm assumes that the complexity of the video content isuniformly distributed along the frames in the video sequence. On thisbasis, the greedy algorithm allocates a fraction of the available bitsto each of the frames in the sequence. In real-time applications, thelimited availability of future frame information also makes it difficultto consider temporal quality in rate control.

In this disclosure, to find a practical solution and simplify the bitallocation problem, it is generally assumed that a good frame-level ratecontrol is available. This assumption reduces the bit allocation problemto macroblock-level bit allocation. At the same time, the bit allocationscheme may take advantage of a non-ROI skipping approach. The non-ROIskipping increases the chance to reduce the value of the temporaldistortion term D_(NT)( f ₁, . . . , f _(M)) because the skipped regionwill present the same perceptual quality as that of the previous frame.Thus, the skipping of the non-ROI area may reduce fluctuation of theperceptual quality between consecutive frames.

For purposes of illustration, the image quality of a video frame isevaluated according to equation (1). For simplicity, however, β and γare set so that β+γ=1. Denoting R_(budget) as the total bit budget for agiven frame f and R the bit rate for coding the frame, the problem canbe represented by the following function:Minimize α[βD_(RF)(f, f)+(1−β)D_(RS)( f)]+(1−α)[βD_(NF)(f,f)+(1−β)D_(NS)( f)],  (3)Such that R≦R_(budget).

The above optimization problem could be solved by Lagrangian relaxationand dynamic programming. However, the computational complexity of suchan approach would be much higher than a real-time system could bear.Therefore, in accordance with this disclosure, a low-complexitynear-optimal solution is preferred. In particular, in this disclosure, atwo-stage bit allocation algorithm in the ρ domain is applied. The firststage involves the following optimization problem:Minimize αD_(RF)(f, f)+(1−α) D_(NF)(f, f), such that R≦R_(budget).  4)

After the optimal coding parameters for equation (4) are obtained, thesecond stage adjusts the coding parameters iteratively to reduce theterm αD_(RS)( f)+(1−α)D_(NS)( f) until a local minimum is reached. Theresult of this two-stage algorithm may be very close to the optimalsolution when β is a relatively large number. When β=1, problems (3) and(4) are identical. In this disclosure, the focus is on the first stageand a solution to problem (4).

In ROI video coding, N is the number of MBs in the frame, {ρ_(i)},{σ_(i)}, {R_(i)} and {D_(i)} are the set of ρ's, standard deviation,rates and distortion (sum of squared error), respectively, for the ithmacroblocks. Thus,

$R = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}{R_{i}.}}$A set of weights {w_(i)} is defined for all MBs in the frame as:

$\begin{matrix}{w_{i} = \left\{ {\begin{matrix}\frac{\alpha}{K} & {{if}\mspace{14mu}{the}\mspace{14mu} i\;{th}\mspace{14mu}{MB}\mspace{14mu}{belongs}\mspace{14mu}{to}\mspace{11mu}{ROI}} \\\frac{1 - \alpha}{\left( {N - K} \right)} & {{if}\mspace{14mu}{the}\mspace{14mu} i\;{th}\mspace{14mu}{MB}\mspace{14mu}{belongs}\mspace{14mu}{to}{\mspace{11mu}\;}{Non}\text{-}{ROI}}\end{matrix},} \right.} & (5)\end{matrix}$where K is the number of MBs within the ROI. Equation (5) may beimplemented, e.g., by ROI weights calculator 46. Therefore, the weighteddistortion of the frame is:

$\begin{matrix}{{D = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}{w_{i}D_{i}}} = {\left\lbrack {{\alpha\;{D_{RF}\left( {f,\overset{\sim}{f}} \right)}} + {\left( {1 - \alpha} \right){D_{NF}\left( {f,\overset{\sim}{f}} \right)}}} \right\rbrack*255^{2}*384}}},} & (6)\end{matrix}$Hence the problem (4) can be rewritten as:Minimize D, such that R≦R_(budget.)  (7)Equation (7) is solved by using a modeling-based bit allocationapproach. The distribution of the AC coefficients of a nature image canbe best approximated by a Laplacian distribution

${p(x)} = {\frac{\eta}{2}{{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \eta}{x}}.}}$Therefore, the rate and distortion of the ith macroblock can be modeledin equations (8) and (9) below as functions of ρ.

For example, rate can be represented as:R _(i) =Aρ _(i) +B,  (8)where A and B are constant modeling parameters, and A can be thought ofas the average number of bits needed to encode non-zero coefficients andB can be thought of as the bits due to non-texture information.

In addition, distortion can be represented as:D_(i)=384σ_(i) ² e ^(−θρ) ^(i) ^(/384)  (9)where θ is an unknown constant and σ is the standard deviation of theresidual data. Here, the bit allocation technique optimizes ρ_(i)instead of quantizers because it is assumed there is a sufficientlyaccurate ρ-QP table available to generate an acceptable quantizer fromany selected ρ_(i). In general, equation (7) can be solved by usingLagrangian relaxation in which the constrained problem is converted intoan unconstrained problem as follows:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{\underset{\rho_{i}}{Minimize}\mspace{11mu} J_{\lambda}} = {{\lambda\; R} + D}} \\{= {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left( {{\lambda\; R_{i}} + {w_{i}D_{i}}} \right)}} \\{{= {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left\lbrack {{\lambda\left( {{A\;\rho_{i}} + B} \right)} + {384w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \theta}\;{\rho_{i}/384}}}} \right\rbrack}},}\end{matrix} & (10)\end{matrix}$where λ* is the solution that enables

${\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}R_{i}} = {R_{budget}.}$By setting partial derivatives to zero in equation (10), the followingexpression for the optimized ρ_(i) is obtained:

$\begin{matrix}{{{{let}\mspace{14mu}\frac{\partial J_{\lambda}}{\partial\rho_{i}}} = {\frac{\partial{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left\lbrack {{\lambda\left( {{A\;\rho_{i}} + B} \right)} + {384w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \theta}\;{\rho_{i}/384}}}} \right\rbrack}}{\partial\rho_{i}} = 0}},} & (11) \\{{{{{which}{\mspace{11mu}\;}{is}}{\lambda\; A} - {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \theta}\;{\rho_{i}/384}}}} = 0},} & (12) \\{{so}{{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \theta}\;{\rho_{i}/384}} = {\frac{\lambda\; A}{\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}}.}}} & (13) \\{{and}{\rho_{i} = {{\frac{384}{\theta}\left\lbrack {{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)} - {\ln\left( {\lambda\; A} \right)}} \right\rbrack}.}}} & (14)\end{matrix}$On the other hand, because:

$\begin{matrix}{{R_{budget} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}R_{i}} = {{\frac{384A}{\theta}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left\lbrack {{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)} - {\ln\left( {\lambda\; A} \right)}} \right\rbrack}} + {NB}}}},} & (15)\end{matrix}$the following relationship holds,

$\begin{matrix}{{\ln\left( {\lambda\; A} \right)} = {{\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)}}} - {\frac{\theta}{384{NA}}{\left( {R_{budget} - {NB}} \right).}}}} & (16)\end{matrix}$

From equations (14) and (16), bit allocation model I is obtained asfollows:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{\rho_{i} = {\frac{384}{\theta}\begin{bmatrix}{{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)} - {\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)}}} +} \\{\frac{\theta}{384{NA}}\left( {R_{budget} - {NB}} \right)}\end{bmatrix}}} \\{= {\frac{R_{budget} - {NB}}{NA} + {{\frac{384}{\theta}\left\lbrack {{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)} - \frac{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}{\ln\left( {\theta\; w_{i}\sigma_{i}^{2}} \right)}}{N}} \right\rbrack}.}}}\end{matrix} & (17)\end{matrix}$The resulting ρ is then mapped to a corresponding QP, and used toallocate an appropriate number of coding bits to the respective ROI ornon-ROI MB.

Another bit allocation model (bit allocation model II) may be obtainedusing an alternative distortion model. According to the alternativedistortion model, assuming the availability of a uniform quantizer withstep size q, the distortion caused by quantization is given by:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{D(q)} = {{2{\int_{0}^{0.5q}{{p(x)}x{\mathbb{d}x}}}} + {2{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{\infty}{\int_{{({i - 0.5})}q}^{{({i + 0.5})}q}{{p(x)}{{x - {iq}}}{\mathbb{d}x}}}}}}} \\{= {\frac{1}{\eta}\left\lbrack {1 + {\frac{{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \eta}\; q}}{1 - {\mathbb{e}}^{{- \eta}\; q}}\left( {2 - {\mathbb{e}}^{{- 0.5}\;\eta\; q} - {\mathbb{e}}^{0.5\;\eta\; q}} \right)} - {\mathbb{e}}^{{- 0.5}\;\eta\; q}} \right\rbrack}}\end{matrix} & (18)\end{matrix}$and the percentage of zeros is given by

$\begin{matrix}{\psi = {{\int_{{- 0.5}q}^{0.5q}{\frac{\eta}{2}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \eta}{x}}{\mathbb{d}x}}} = {1 - {{\mathbb{e}}^{{- 0.5}\;\eta\; q}.}}}} & (19) \\{{Thus},{{D(q)} = {\frac{\psi}{\eta\left( {2 - \psi} \right)}.}}} & (20)\end{matrix}$According to Shannon's source coding theorem, as described in T. M.Cover and J. A. Thomas, “Elements of information theory”, Wiley, NewYork, N.Y., 1991, for a Laplacian source, the minimum number of bitsneeded to represent a symbol is given by:

$\begin{matrix}{{{{R(q)} = {\log_{2}\left( \frac{1}{\eta\;{D(q)}} \right)}},{{such}{\mspace{11mu}\;}{that}}}{R_{i} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{384}{R(q)}} = {{384\;{\log_{2}\left( \frac{1}{\eta\;{D(q)}} \right)}} = {384\;\log_{2}{\frac{2 - \psi_{i}}{\psi_{i}}.}}}}}} & (21)\end{matrix}$Since

${\psi_{i} = {1 - \frac{\rho_{i}}{384}}},$where 384 is the total number of coefficients in the ith macroblock for4:2:0 video, equation (21) can be expanded by using Taylor expansion andthe relationship between bit rate and ρ can be approximated by:R _(i) =Aρ _(i) +B,  (22)where A and B are constant modeling parameters, and A can be thought ofas the average number of bits needed to encode a non-zero coefficientsand B can be thought of as the bits due to non-texture information.

In addition, the variance of the coefficients is represented by:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sigma^{2} = {{\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{{p(x)}x^{2}{\mathbb{d}x}}} = {{\int_{- \infty}^{+ \infty}{\frac{\eta}{2}x^{2}{\mathbb{e}}^{{- \eta}{x}}{\mathbb{d}x}}} = \frac{2}{\eta^{2}}}}},} & (23)\end{matrix}$As a result, the distortion of the ith macroblock can be represented by:

$\begin{matrix}{D_{i} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{384}{D(q)}} = {\frac{384\;\psi_{i}}{\eta\left( {2 - \psi_{i}} \right)} = {\frac{384 - \rho_{i}}{\sqrt{2}\left( {384 + \rho_{i}} \right)}{\sigma_{i}.}}}}} & (24)\end{matrix}$As in the derivation of bit allocation model I, the optimal bitallocation scheme can be achieved by solving the optimization problem(7), i.e., the following problem:

$\begin{matrix}{{\underset{\rho_{i}}{{Minimiz}e}\mspace{14mu} D},{{{such}\mspace{14mu}{that}\mspace{14mu} R} \leq {R_{budget}.}}} & (25)\end{matrix}$In general, equation (25) can be solved by using Lagrangian relaxationin which the constrained problem is converted into an unconstrainedproblem as follows:

$\begin{matrix}{{{\underset{\rho_{i}}{{Minimize}{\;\mspace{11mu}}}J_{\lambda}} = {{{\lambda\; R} + D} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left( {{\lambda\; R_{i}} + D_{i}} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left\lbrack {{\lambda\left( {{A\;\rho_{i}} + B} \right)} + {\frac{\left( {384 - \rho_{i}} \right)}{\sqrt{2}\left( {384 + \rho_{i}} \right)}\sigma_{i}}} \right\rbrack}}}},} & (26)\end{matrix}$where λ* is the solution that enables

${\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}R_{i}} = {R_{budget}.}$By setting partial derivatives to zero in (26), the following expressionfor the optimized ρ_(i), is obtained:

$\begin{matrix}{{{{let}\mspace{14mu}\frac{\partial J_{\lambda}}{\partial\rho_{i}}} = {\frac{\partial{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\left\lbrack {{\lambda\left( {{A\;\rho_{i}} + B} \right)} + {\frac{\left( {384 - \rho_{i}} \right)}{\sqrt{2}\left( {384 + \rho_{i}} \right)}\sigma_{i}}} \right\rbrack}}{\partial\rho_{i}} = 0}},{{which}\mspace{14mu}{is}\text{:}}} & (27) \\{{{{\lambda\; A} - {\frac{384\sqrt{2}}{\left( {384 + \rho_{i}} \right)^{2}}\sigma_{i}}} = 0},{so}} & (28) \\{\rho_{i} = {\sqrt{\frac{384\sqrt{2}}{A\;\lambda}\sigma_{i}} - 384.}} & (29)\end{matrix}$On the other hand, because:

$\begin{matrix}{{R_{budget} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}R_{i}} = {{A{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\frac{384\sqrt{2}}{A\;\lambda}\sigma_{i}}}} - {384N\; A} + {N\; B}}}},{then}} & (30) \\{\sqrt{\frac{384\sqrt{2}}{A\;\lambda}} = {\frac{R_{budget} + {384N\; A} - {N\; B}}{A{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{i}}}}.}} & (31)\end{matrix}$From equations (28) and (30), the following expression is obtained:

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{\rho_{i} = {{\frac{\sqrt{\sigma_{i}}}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{j}}}\left( {\frac{R_{budget}}{A} - {N\frac{B}{A}}} \right)} + {384\frac{\sqrt{\sigma_{i}} - {\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{j}}}}}{\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{j}}}}}}},} \\{{= {{\frac{\sqrt{\sigma_{i}}}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{j}}}\rho_{budget}} + {384\frac{\sqrt{\sigma_{i}} - {\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{j}}}}}{\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{\sigma_{j}}}}}}},}\end{matrix} & (32)\end{matrix}$where ρ_(budget) is the total ρ budget for the frame.Although the distortion is modeled differently in equation (32), basedon that model, the following bit allocation model II is obtained:

$\begin{matrix}{\rho_{i} = {\frac{\sqrt{w_{i}\sigma_{i}}}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sqrt{w_{i}\sigma_{j}}}{\rho_{budget}.}}} & (33)\end{matrix}$Equation (33) may be implemented, e.g., by bit allocation module 48.

FIG. 12 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of encodingtechniques using weighted bit allocation models I and II and an optimalsolution. The optimal solution is achieved by Lagrangian relaxation,whereas bit allocation models I and II are implemented as describedabove. FIG. 12 shows PSNR in decibels versus frame number during ROIcoding of the first 100 frames of the standard Foreman video testsequence. In FIG. 12, the optimal solution, bit allocation model I, andbit allocation model II are identified by reference numerals 91, 93 and95, respectively. For bit allocation models I and II, the value of α is0.9 for purposes of bit allocation weighting equation (5). As shown inFIG. 12, both bit allocation models I and II perform very well incomparison to the optimal solution.

FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating a technique for non-ROI(“background”) skipping. The ability to skip encoding of non-ROI areasof a video frame can result in significant savings in bit allocation. Ifa non-ROI is not encoded, i.e., skipped, the bits otherwise allocated tothe non-ROI can instead be re-allocated for encoding the ROI to improvevisual quality of MBs in the ROI. If the non-ROI is skipped for a givenframe, the non-ROI encoded for a preceding frame is repeated orsubstituted by an interpolated non-ROI area in the current frame. Inaddition to conserving bits for ROI encoding, the skipping of thenon-ROI area may improve the temporal quality of the current frame. Inparticular, presenting the same non-ROI area in two or more consecutiveframes will tend to reduce temporal flicker in the non-ROI areas.

At very low bitrate, e.g., at 32 kbps, the non-ROI regions are normallycoarsely coded even if the bits are uniformly distributed among MBs,where temporal visual quality issues such as flickering becomeprominent. On the other hand, in most cases of video telephonyapplications where background are non-ROI, there are very limitedmovements in the background. Therefore, background skipping is asolution for reallocating bits to improve the quality of ROI and codednon-ROI regions as long as the skipping does not severely degrade thevideo fidelity.

Frame skipping is a popular approach used in very low-bitrateapplications to conserve coding bits. The difference between non-ROIskipping and frame skipping is that the ROI for each frame is coded inthe non-ROI skipping approach to ensure good visual quality of the ROI.Frame skipping is very helpful in many applications. In ROI videocoding, however, frame skipping would risk the loss of importantinformation such as facial expressions, especially when α is set at alarge value in equation (1), as any distortion of ROI would be heavilypunished and could degrade the overall performance. Therefore, non-ROIskipping is a better choice and can generally save a significant numberof bits to improve ROI quality because the number of background MBs isdominant in normal video frames.

As shown in FIG. 13, the non-ROI skipping technique involves a groupingof successive frames into a unit that includes the ROI areas for theframes and a common non-ROI area shared among the frames. In the exampleof FIG. 13, two consecutive frames are grouped. The non-ROI backgroundskipping module 50 groups frames i and i+1 into a frame unit (96), andnotifies video encoder 58 of the frame in which the non-ROI area will beskipped. In response, video encoder 58 encodes the respective ROI areasof frames i and i+1 using the weighted bit allocation provided by bitallocation module 48 (98). In addition, video encoder 58 encodes thenon-ROI area of frame i using the weighted bit allocation (100).However, video encoder 58 does not encode the non-ROI area of frame i+1.Instead, the non-ROI area of frame i+1 is skipped, and the non-ROI areaof the preceding frame i is provided in its place.

The non-ROI skipping may be provided on a full-time basis. For example,every two frames may be grouped into a unit for purposes of continuous,full-time skipping of the non-ROI on an alternating frame basis. Inother words, the non-ROI in every second frame may be skipped on afull-time basis. As an alternative, skipping may be activated anddeactivated on an adaptive basis. Skipping may be deactivated whennon-ROI distortion produced by a recent, previous frame exceeds adistortion threshold. As shown in FIG. 13, for example, if distortion inthe non-ROI area of a previous frame is less than the threshold (102),the non-ROI for frame i+1 is skipped (104), and the process continues tothe next group of two successive frames, as represented by the frameincrement i=i+2 (106). In this case, the level of non-ROI distortion isacceptable, and skipping is activated. If non-ROI distortion is greaterthan the distortion threshold (102), however, the non-ROI area of framei+1 is encoded using weighted bit allocation (108). In this case,skipping is deactivated due to excessive non-ROI distortion, i.e.,excessive distortion within the non-ROI area of the pertinent videoscene.

FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating grouping of successive frames in aunit to support non-ROI skipping. As shown in FIG. 14, frames 0, 1, 2and 3 represents successive frames within a video sequence. In thisexample, frame 0 and frame 1 are grouped into unit 1, and frame 2 andframe 3 are grouped into unit 2. Each unit shares a common non-ROI area.In particular, in the case of either full-time skipping or adaptiveskipping with acceptable distortion, the non-ROI area of frame 0 isrepeated for frame 1. Because the non-ROI area of frame 0 is repeatedfor frame 1, it is not necessary to encode the non-ROI area of frame 1.The grouping of frames into units may be applied throughout a videosequence. In the example of FIG. 14, two frames are grouped into a unit.In some applications, however, two or more frames may be grouped into aunit, with the non-ROI being skipped in all but one of the frames in theunit.

FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating encoding of successive ROI areas witha common non-ROI area. In particular, upon grouping successive frames 0and 1 into a unit, the ROI areas 110, 112 in frames 0 and 1,respectively, are encoded. However, the frame 0 non-ROI area 114 isrepeated for both frame 0 and frame 1, such that the non-ROI area (notshown) for frame 1 is skipped. In this manner, the bit consumptionotherwise required for encoding the frame 1 non-ROI are can be avoided.In the example of FIG. 15, it should be noted that the non-ROI area 114,although referred to as “background,” may include foreground featuressuch as a person's shoulders. Accordingly, background is generally usedin this disclosure to refer to any area outside the ROI, and should notbe considered as strictly limited to background imagery within a videoscene. The non-ROI skipping is described in further detail below.

An exemplary prototype system for implementation of non-ROI skippingmodule 50 of FIG. 4 will now be described. In the prototype system,every two frames are grouped into a unit as described above withreference to FIGS. 13-15. In each unit, the first non-ROI area is codedwhile the second non-ROI area is skipped, e.g., using predicted MBs withzero motion vectors. The bit allocation for each unit may be based onthe same logic as the “greedy” frame-level bit allocation, with theassumption that the content complexity of the video frames in a sequenceis uniformly distributed across the frames. With this assumption, thebits should be allocated uniformly among two-frame units as:

$\begin{matrix}{{\rho_{{unit}\mspace{11mu} i} = \frac{\rho_{Sequence} - \rho_{used}}{\frac{M}{2} - i}},} & (34)\end{matrix}$where ρ_(sequence) is the total ρ-budget for a group of M consecutiveframes in the video sequence, ρ_(unit i) is the ρ allocation for the ithunit, and ρ_(used) is the ρ consumption of the first (i−1)/2 units.Within a unit, either bit allocation model (I or II) may be used toallocate bits to MBs within the ROI and non-ROI areas.

To evaluate the results of non-ROI skipping, as described herein,several tests have been performed. In the tests, the following bitallocation techniques were compared: (a) a weighted bit allocationalgorithm, based on model II, with full-time non-ROI skipping; (b) aweighted bit allocation algorithm, based on model II, without non-ROIskipping; and (c) a “greedy” algorithm, in which ROI and non-ROI MBs areequally treated in the bit allocation. The tests were conducted on thefirst 150 frames of the standard “Carphone” QCIF video sequences at arate of 15 frames per second (fps). The results of the comparison areshown in FIGS. 16-23.

FIG. 16 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of the aboveencoding techniques (a), (b) and (c). In particular, FIG. 16 plotsperceptual PSNR in decibels (db) over a range of encoding rates inkilobits per second (kbps). FIG. 17 is a graph comparing overall videofidelity of the above encoding techniques (a), (b) and (c). The term“overall” video fidelity refers to the combination of both ROI andnon-ROI areas, i.e., video fidelity of the entire frame, and mayalternatively be referred to as “frame” video fidelity. FIG. 17 plots“frame” PSNR in decibels (db) over a range of encoding rates in kilobitsper second (kbps).

FIGS. 18 and 19 are graphs comparing ROI video fidelity and non-ROIvideo fidelity, respectively, of the above encoding techniques (a), (b)and (c). In particular, FIGS. 18 and 19 plot PSNR in decibels (dbs) overa range of encoding rates in kilobits per second (kbps). ROI videofidelity, per FIG. 18, refers to video fidelity within the ROI area ofthe video frame. The non-ROI video, per FIG. 19, refers to videofidelity within the non-ROI area of the video frame. FIGS. 16-19represent application of a user preference factor α=0.9 in the weightedbit allocation algorithms. In each of FIGS. 16-19, the curves for (a)weighted bit allocation with full-time non-ROI skipping, (b) weightedbit allocation with no skipping, and (c) the greedy algorithm areidentified by reference numerals 116, 118, 120, respectively.

FIGS. 20 and 21 are graphs comparing overall perceptual quality andoverall video fidelity, respectively, of the above encoding techniques(a), (b), (c). In particular, FIG. 20 plots perceptual PSNR in decibels(db) over a range of encoding rates in kilobits per second (kbps). FIG.21 plots PSNR in decibels (db) over a range of encoding rates inkilobits per second (kbps). FIGS. 20 and 21 represent application of auser preference factor α=0.7 in the weighted bit allocation algorithms.FIGS. 22 and 23 are graphs comparing overall perceptual quality andoverall video fidelity, respectively, of encoding techniques (a), (b)and (c). FIGS. 22 and 23 represent application of a user preferencefactor α=0.5 in the weighted bit allocation algorithms. In FIGS. 20-23,the curves for (a) weighted bit allocation with full-time non-ROIskipping, (b) weighted bit allocation with no skipping, and (c) thegreedy algorithm are identified by reference numerals 116, 118, 120,respectively.

For the test results shown in FIGS. 16-23, the four sets of videoquality measures, Perceptual PSNR, Frame PSNR, ROI PSNR, and non-ROIPSNR, have been defined as follows:

-   -   1. Perceptual PSNR=−10 log₁₀ D_(Frame);    -   2. Frame PSNR=−10 log₁₀ D_(F)(f, f);    -   3. ROI PSNR=−10 log₁₀ D_(RF)(f, f); and    -   4. Non-ROI PSNR=−10 log₁₀ D_(NF)(f, f).        In the above expressions, D_(Frame) is the overall temporal and        spatial distortion for a frame, D_(F) is the video fidelity        between an original frame and a reconstructed frame, D_(RF) is        the video fidelity between the ROI areas of an original frame        and a reconstructed frame, and D_(NF) is the video fidelity        between the non-ROI areas of an original frame and a        reconstructed frame. Perceptual PSNR is shown in FIGS. 16, 20,        and 22. Frame PSNR is shown in FIGS. 17, 21, and 23. ROI PSNR is        shown in FIG. 18, and non-ROI PSNR is shown in FIG. 19. The        results shown in FIGS. 16-23 demonstrate that the proposed        non-ROI skipping approach has gains of more than 1 dB in        Perceptual PSNR (PPSNR) compared with the other approaches in        all of the tests. The gains mainly come from the improvement of        the ROI quality, as shown in FIGS. 18 and 19, by reallocating        bits from non-ROI to ROI in coding the frames.

An interesting observation is that the non-ROI (background) skippingapproaches also outperformed other approaches in terms of frame PSNR atlow bit rate, as shown in FIGS. 17, 21 and 23. In addition, the graphsshow that the gains in frame PSNR increase with the decreasing of userpreference factor α. These observations indicate that the non-ROIskipping approach is very appealing for very low-bitrate applicationslike wireless VT, because it outperforms other approaches not only interms of video fidelity but also visual quality. It is expected that theweighted bit allocation approach will outperform the greedy algorithmwhen a is assigned a larger value, e.g., α=0.9 in FIG. 16. However, theadvantage decreases with the decreasing of a as shown in FIGS. 20 and22.

Additional tests have been performed to evaluate the performance of bitallocation techniques incorporating non-ROI skipping versus weighted bitallocation techniques that rely on frame skipping, i.e., skipping of anentire frame instead of skipping only the non-ROI area. FIG. 24 is agraph comparing perceptual quality of ROI encoding techniques usingstandard frame skipping and background skipping. In each case, weightedbit allocation, as described herein, was applied. In one case, non-ROI(background) skipping was applied. In the other case, full-time frameskipping was applied such that every other frame was skipped on analternating basis. FIG. 24 plots perceptual PSNR in decibels versus ratein kilobits per second (kbps). In FIG. 24, reference numerals 122, 124and 126 identify curves for weighted bit allocation with frame skippingand a user preference factor α=0.9, 0.7, and 0.5, respectively.Reference numerals 128, 130, 132 identify curves for weighted bitallocation with non-ROI skipping and a user preference factor α=0.9,0.7, and 0.5, respectively. As shown in FIG. 24, weighted bit allocationwith non-ROI skipping outperformed weighted bit allocation with frameskipping in all settings of α. The performance gain provided by non-ROIskipping increases with increases in the value of α. This result isreasonable because with larger α, the punishment on ROI for frameskipping becomes heavier.

As demonstrated by FIGS. 16-24, the non-ROI background skipping approachresults in good performance, particularly when the non-ROI maintainsrelatively low movement. For video sequences having non-ROI areas thatcontain a large amount of motion, however, the performance gain may bediminished. At the same time, important background information may beskipped, resulting in degradation of system performance. Accordingly, itis desirable that background skipping be turned off when the skippingseverely degrades video fidelity, e.g., when the background contentcontains important information. As an example, ROI coding by weightedbit allocation with non-ROI skipping turned on and off was applied tothe 180^(th) to 209^(th) frames of the standard Carphone video testsequence, in which the background moves quickly. FIG. 25 shows theresults of this analysis. More particularly, FIG. 25 is a graphcomparing perceptual quality of ROI encoding techniques for weighted bitallocation, as described herein, when non-ROI skipping is turned on andoff.

FIG. 25 graphs perceptual PSNR in decibels versus rate in kilobits persecond. In FIG. 25, reference numerals 134 and 136 identify curvesrepresenting application of weighted bit allocation with non-ROIskipping turned on and user preference factor α=0.9 and 0.5,respectively. Reference numerals 138, 140 identify curves representingapplication of weighted bit allocation with non-ROI skipping turned offand user preference factor α=0.9 and 0.5, respectively. The results inFIG. 25 indicate that the advantage of non-ROI skipping compareddecreases with the decreasing of α, e.g., from 0.9 to 0.5. This resultalso indicates the value of developing an adaptive non-ROI skippingapproach that enables dynamic control of the non-ROI skipping based onthe content of the video sequence and the user's interest level, asrepresented by user preference factor α.

The distortion produced by weighted bit allocation with and withoutnon-ROI skipping can be explicitly compared, as indicated below:D _(Skip) _(—) _(on) =αD _(RF)(ρ₁)+(1−α)D _(NF)(ρ₂)+αD_(RF)(ρ_(unit)−ρ₁−ρ₂)+(1−α)D _(NonROI) _(—) _(skip),  (35)D _(Skip) _(—) _(off) =αD _(RF)(ρ₁′)+(1−α)D _(NF)(ρ₂′)+(1−αD_(NF)(ρ_(unit)−ρ₁′−ρ₂′−ρ₃′),  (36)where D_(Skip) _(—) _(on) is the unit total distortion when the non-ROIskipping mode is on, D_(Skip) _(—) _(off) is the unit total distortionwhen the background skipping mode is off, D_(NonROI) _(—) _(Skip) is thedistortion caused by skipping the non-ROI in the second frame of theunit, and where β₁ and β₂ in equation (35) and β₁′, ρ₂′ and ρ₃′ inequation (36) are the number of AC coefficients (ρ) allocated to theROIs and non-ROI.

It can be observed from equations (35) and (36) that D_(Skip) _(—)_(on)>D_(Skip) _(—) _(off) holds only if D_(NonROI) _(—)_(skip)>>D_(NF)(ρ_(unit)−ρ₁′−ρ₂′−ρ₃′) because generally the followingexpression holds:αD _(RF)(β₁)+(1−α)D _(NF)(ρ₂)+αD _(RF)(ρ_(unit)−ρ₁−ρ₂)<αD_(RF)(ρ₁′)+(1−α)D _(NF)(ρ₂′)+αD _(RF)(ρ₃′)This observation is verified to be true from the statistics ofD_(NonROI) _(—) _(skip) for the Carphone video test sequence as shown inFIG. 26. FIG. 26 is a graph illustrating distortion caused by backgroundskipping over an exemplary video sequence. In particular, FIG. 26 plotsaveraged non-ROI region residue energy D_(NonROI) _(—) _(skip) versusframe number over the first 240 frames of the Carphone video testsequence. From FIG. 26, it is apparent that the D_(NonROI) _(—) _(skip)values are much larger than others during frames 180-209, which are theframes characterized by a high degree of motion. Hence, whereas non-ROIskipping is generally favorable, it is unfavorable during thehigh-motion portion presented by frames 180-209.

Based on the observation above, the task of pursuing a criterion forturning the background skipping mode on and off is converted into a taskof looking for a threshold for the distortion of D_(NonROI) _(—)_(skip). If it is assumed that the unit distortion in a video sequencevaries in a smooth fashion, which is generally true, then the averagevalue of the most recently processed unit distortion can be used forderiving the distortion threshold. Denoting D _(n) as the meandistortion of the most recent n units, then based on (35) and (36) it isvery possible to make

$D_{Skip\_ on} > {D_{Skip\_ off}\mspace{14mu}{if}\mspace{14mu}\left( {1 - \alpha} \right)D_{NonROI\_ skip}} > \frac{{\overset{\_}{D}}_{n}}{2}$holds. In other words, the criterion for switching off non-ROI skippingcan be specified as

$D_{NonROI\_ skip} > {\frac{{\overset{\_}{D}}_{n}}{2\left( {1 - \alpha} \right)}.}$This criterion can serve as the basis for an adaptive non-ROI skippingalgorithm.

The adaptive non-ROI skipping algorithm may substantially conform to theprocess shown in FIG. 13, and can be further described as follows.

-   -   Step 0: Initialize the data, and set D _(n)=0, and skipping        mode=ON.    -   Step 1: Allocate ρ budget for the current unit (group of two        successive frames F_(n) and F_(n+1)) using equation (34).    -   Step 2: Within the current unit, allocate bits for each        macroblocks by equation (32). If the skipping mode is ON, then        no bits are assigned for the non-ROI for the second frame within        the unit.    -   Step 3: After the distortion for the current unit is obtained,        update D _(n) by D _(n)=(1−η) D _(n−1)+ηD_(n), where η is a        learning factor and is in a range of [0, 1].    -   Step 4: Get data for the next unit; if this is the last unit, go        to step 6.    -   Step 5: Calculate the distortion of D_(NonROI) _(—) _(skip) for        the new unit (group of next two frames F_(n+2) and F_(n+3)); if

$D_{NonROI\_ skip} > \frac{{\overset{\_}{D}}_{n}}{2\;\left( {1\; - \;\alpha} \right)}$

-   -    then turn the skipping mode OFF; otherwise, turn the skipping        mode ON. Return to step 1.    -   Step 6: Terminate the adaptive skipping algorithm.

FIG. 27 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using non-ROI skipping, no non-ROI skipping, and adaptivenon-ROI skipping. In each case, a weighted bit allocation algorithm asdescribed herein was applied. FIG. 27 plots perceptual PSNR in decibelsversus rate in kilobits per second for ROI video coding of frames180-209 of the standard Carphone video test sequence. Reference numerals142 and 144 identify curves representing weighted bit allocation withnon-ROI skipping ON and user preference factor α=0.9 and 0.5,respectively. Reference numerals 146 and 148 identify curvesrepresenting weighted bit allocation with non-ROI skipping OFF and userpreference factor α=0.9 and 0.5, respectively. Reference numerals 150and 152 identify curves representing weighted bit allocation withadaptive non-ROI skipping and user preference factors α=0.9 and 0.5,respectively. In this evaluation, the value η was set to η=0.25. Theresults in FIG. 27 show that the result of the adaptive non-ROI skippingapproach is very close to the best solutions for various values of α.

FIGS. 28-33 show additional experimental results for ROI codingtechniques that apply weighted bit allocation techniques as described inthis disclosure. FIGS. 28-32 represent application of various ROI codingtechniques to the standard Carphone video test sequence. For FIGS.28-32, the user preference factor α used in the weighted bit allocationapproaches (“Proposed approach” and “Weighted bit allocation”) was setat 0.9. The “Proposed approach” label refers to weighted bit allocationwith non-ROI skipping. The “Weighted bit allocation” label refers toweighted bit allocation without non-ROI skipping.

FIG. 28 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques, and plots perceptualPSNR versus rate. In FIG. 28, reference numerals 154, 156, 158, 160 and162 identify curves representing application of a frame skippingapproach, the weighted bit allocation approach with non-ROI skipping, agreedy algorithm, a constant QP algorithm, and the weighted bitallocation approach without non-ROI skipping, respectively.

FIG. 29 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps). In particular, FIG. 29 plots perceptualPSNR versus frame number for weighted bit allocation with non-ROIskipping, the greedy algorithm, and a constant QP algorithm.

FIG. 30 is a graph comparing overall video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps), and plots PSNR versus frame number.FIG. 31 is a graph comparing ROI video fidelity of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques at an encoding rateof 40 kilobits per second (kps), and plots PSNR in the ROI versus framenumber. FIG. 32 is a graph comparing non-ROI video fidelity of ROIencoding techniques using various bit allocation techniques at anencoding rate of 40 kilobits per second (kps), and plots non-ROI PSNRversus frame number.

In FIGS. 29-32, weighted bit allocation with non-ROI skipping isindicated by reference numeral 164, the greedy algorithm is indicated byreference numeral 166, and a constant QP algorithm is indicated byreference numeral 168. The constant QP algorithm is a frame-level onlyrate control algorithm in which all MBs in a frame are assigned anidentical quantizer. The greedy algorithm has been described above, andoperates at the MB-level. The frame skipping algorithm applies standardframe skipping to avoid encoding the contents of every other frame on analternating basis, and skips both ROI and non-ROI areas. Weighted bitallocation without non-ROI skipping and weighted bit allocation withadaptive frame skipping (“Proposed approach”) have been described above.

FIG. 28 shows that the proposed approach outperformed all otherapproaches in the entire bitrate range and that the performance gain isup to 2 dB. In FIGS. 29-32, frame-level details of the proposedapproach, greedy algorithm and constant QP algorithm are demonstrated.

FIG. 33 is a graph comparing overall perceptual quality of ROI encodingtechniques using various bit allocation techniques for another exemplaryvideo sequence over a range of encoding rates. In particular, FIG. 33plots perceptual PSNR versus rate over the first 180 frames of thestandard Foreman video test sequence. In FIG. 33, reference numerals154, 156, 158, 160 and 162 identify curves representing application of aframe skipping approach, the weighted bit allocation approach withnon-ROI skipping, a greedy algorithm, a constant QP algorithm, and theweighted bit allocation approach without non-ROI skipping, respectively.

As shown in FIG. 33, the frame skipping approach does not perform aswell as in the Carphone sequence, because the face of the Foremansequence contains much larger motion compared with the Carphonesequence. As a result, frame skipping misses an excessive amount of ROIinformation in the Foreman sequence, resulting in unsatisfactoryperformance. Notably, the propose approach of weighted bit allocationwith adaptive non-ROI skipping performs very well for the Foremansequence, as demonstrated by FIG. 33.

In this disclosure, various techniques have been described to supportROI coding for video telephony or video streaming applications,especially when presented with very low bit rate requirements, e.g., inwireless video telephony. The disclosure presents two differentoptimized weighted bit allocation schemes in the ρ-domain for ROI videocoding. The disclosure also presents adaptive non-ROI (“background”)skipping approach that can work jointly with the weighted bit allocationmodels to achieve better performance. In addition, this disclosurepresents a video quality metric for measuring the quality of ROI video.The ROI quality metric can be used to guide the optimized bit allocationtechniques to produce better subjective visual quality by jointlyconsidering user preference in the ROI, video fidelity, spatialperceptual quality and temporal perceptual quality. The ROI qualitymetric enables user interaction to bias the coding parameters to fulfillsubjective perceptual quality requirements.

The techniques described herein may be implemented in hardware,software, firmware, or any combination thereof. If implemented insoftware, the techniques may be realized in part by a computer readablemedium comprising program code containing instructions that, whenexecuted, performs one or more of the methods described above. In thiscase, the computer readable medium may comprise random access memory(RAM) such as synchronous dynamic random access memory (SDRAM),read-only memory (ROM), non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM),electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), FLASHmemory, magnetic or optical data storage media, and the like.

The program code may be executed by one or more processors, such as oneor more digital signal processors (DSPs), general purposemicroprocessors, an application specific integrated circuits (ASICs),field programmable logic arrays (FPGAs), or other equivalent integratedor discrete logic circuitry. In some embodiments, the functionalitydescribed herein may be provided within dedicated software modules orhardware units configured for encoding and decoding, or incorporated ina combined video encoder-decoder (CODEC).

Various embodiments have been described. These and other embodiments arewithin the scope of the following claims.

1. A method comprising generating, using a video encoding system, aquality metric for an encoded video frame containing a region ofinterest based on video fidelity of a preceding frame, perceptualquality of the preceding frame, and user preference for the region ofinterest, wherein the user preference indicates a value placed on visualquality of the region of interest by a user and further comprisingallocating encoding bits between the region of interest and areas of thevideo frame that are not within the region of interest based at least inpart on the quality metric.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein theperceptual quality includes a temporal quality value and a spatialquality value for the preceding frame.
 3. The method of claim 2, whereinthe temporal quality value includes a first temporal quality value forthe region of interest, and a second temporal quality value for areasthat are not within the region of interest.
 4. The method of claim 2,wherein the spatial quality value includes a first spatial quality valuefor the region of interest, and a second spatial quality value for areasthat are not within the region of interest.
 5. The method of claim 2,wherein the spatial quality value is based at least in part on presenceof blocking artifacts in the preceding frame, and wherein the temporalquality value is based at least in part on presence of temporal flickerartifacts in the preceding frame.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein thevideo fidelity includes a distortion value based at least in part on apeak signal to noise ratio for the preceding video frame.
 7. The methodof claim 1, wherein allocating encoding bits includes allocating rhodomain values to macroblocks within the frame based on a frame budgetand a weighting between macroblocks within the region of interest andmacroblocks within areas of the video frame that are not within theregion of interest, and mapping the rho domain values to correspondingquantization parameter (QP) values to allocate a number of encoding bitsto each of the macroblocks.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein thequality metric comprises a rate budget specifying the number of encodingbits available for the video frame, and an indication of whetherencoding of the areas that are not within the region of interest will beskipped.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising groupingsuccessive frames into a frame unit, encoding regions of interestassociated with the respective frames, and skipping encoding of areasthat are not within a respective reason of interest for at least one ofthe frames in the frame unit.
 10. The method of claim 9, furthercomprising selectively skipping encoding of areas that are not within arespective region of interest for at least one of the frames when adistortion value associated with a preceding frame unit is less than athreshold value.
 11. The method of claim 1, further comprising obtainingthe user preference as a user preference value from a user, wherein theuser preference value indicates a perceptual importance of visualquality of the region of interest from the perspective of the user. 12.The method of claim 1, wherein the encoded video frame is a first videoframe, the method further comprising encoding a second video frame basedon the allocation of encoding bits.
 13. A device comprising: a videoencoder that encodes a video frame containing a region of interest; anda quality metric calculator that generates a quality metric for thevideo frame based on video fidelity preceding frame, perceptual qualityof a preceding frame, and user preference for the region of interest,wherein the user preference indicates a value placed on visual qualityof the region of interest by a user and further comprising a bitallocation module that allocates encoding bits between the region ofinterest and areas that are not within the region of interest based atleast in part on the quality metric.
 14. The device of claim 13, whereinthe perceptual quality includes a temporal quality value and a spatialquality value for the preceding frame.
 15. The device of claim 14,wherein the temporal quality value includes a first temporal qualityvalue for the region of interest, and a second temporal quality valuefor areas that are not within the region of interest.
 16. The device ofclaim 14, wherein the spatial quality value includes a first spatialquality value for the region of interest, and a second spatial qualityvalue for areas that are not within the region of interest.
 17. Thedevice of claim 14, wherein the spatial quality value is based at leastin part on presence of blocking artifacts in the preceding frame, andwherein the temporal quality value is based at least in part on presenceof temporal flicker artifacts in the preceding frame.
 18. The device ofclaim 13, wherein the video fidelity includes a distortion value basedat least in part on a peak signal to noise ratio for the preceding videoframe.
 19. The device of claim 13, wherein the bit allocation moduleallocates rho domain values to macroblocks within the frame based on aframe budget and a weighting between macroblocks within the region ofinterest and macroblocks within areas of the video frame that are notwithin the region of interest, and maps the rho domain values tocorresponding quantization parameter (QP) values to allocate a number ofencoding bits to each of the macroblocks.
 20. The device of claim 13,wherein the quality metric comprises a rate budget specifying the numberof encoding bits available for the video frame, and an indication ofwhether encoding of the areas that are not within the region of interestwill be skipped.
 21. The device of claim 13, further comprising askipping module that directs the video encoder to group successiveframes into a frame unit, encode regions of interest associated with therespective frames, and skip encoding of areas of the video frame thatare not within a respective region of interest for at least one of theframes within the frame unit.
 22. The device of claim 21, wherein theskipping module directs the video encoder to selectively skip encodingof areas of the video frame that are not within a respective region ofinterest for at least one of the frames when a distortion valueassociated with a preceding frame unit is less than a threshold value.23. The device of claim 13, further comprising a wireless transmitterthat transmits the encoded video frame via a wireless communicationchannel, wherein the device is configured to support mobile videotelephony.
 24. The device of claim 13, further comprising a userpreference input device that obtains he user preference as a userpreference value from a user, wherein the user preference valueindicates a perceptual importance of visual quality of the region ofinterest from the perspective at the user.
 25. The device of claim 13,wherein the device comprises an integrated circuit device.
 26. Thedevice of claim 13, wherein the encoded video frame is a first videoframe, and the video encoder encodes a second video frame based on theallocation of encoding bits.
 27. A computer-readable medium comprisinginstructions to cause a processor to generate a quality metric for anencoded video frame containing a region of interest based on videofidelity of a preceding frame, perceptual quality of the precedingframe, and user preference for the region of interest, wherein the userpreference indicates a value placed on visual quality of the region ofinterest by a user and further comprising instructions to cause theprocessor to allocate encoding bits between the region of interest andareas of the video frame that are not within the region of interestbased at least in part on the quality metric.
 28. The computer-readablemedium of claim 27, wherein the perceptual quality includes a temporalquality value and a spatial quality for the preceding frame.
 29. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 28, wherein the temporal quality valueincludes a first temporal quality value for the region of interest, anda second temporal quality value for areas that are not within the regionof interest.
 30. The computer-readable medium of claim 28, wherein thespatial quality value includes a first spatial quality value for theregion of interest, and a second spatial quality value for areas thatare not within the region of interest.
 31. The computer-readable mediumof claim 28, wherein the spatial quality value is based at least in parton presence of blocking artifacts in the preceding frame, and whereinthe temporal quality value is based at least in part on presence oftemporal flicker artifacts in the preceding frame.
 32. Thecomputer-readable medium of claim 27, wherein the video fidelityincludes a distortion value based at least in part on a peak signal tonoise ratio for the preceding video frame.
 33. The computer-readablemedium of claim 27, wherein the instructions cause the processor toallocate rho domain values to macroblocks within the frame based on aframe budget and a weighting between macroblocks within the region ofinterest and macroblocks within areas of the video frame that are notwithin the region of interest, and map the rho domain values tocorresponding quantization parameter (QP) values to allocate a number ofencoding bits to each of the macroblocks.
 34. The computer-readablemedium of claim 27, wherein the quality metric comprises a rate budgetspecifying the number of encoding bits available for the video frame,and an indication of whether encoding of the areas that are not withinthe region of interest will be skipped.
 35. The computer-readable mediumof claim 27, further comprising instructions to cause the processor togroup successive frames into frame unit, encode regions of interestassociated with the respective frames, and skip encoding of areas thatare not within a respective region of interest for at least one of theframes in the frame unit.
 36. The computer-readable medium of claim 35,further comprising instructions to cause the processor to selectivelyskip encoding of areas that are not within a respective region ofinterest for at least one of the frames when a distortion valueassociated with a preceding frame unit is less than a threshold value.37. The computer-readable medium of claim 27, further comprisinginstructions to cause the processor to obtain the user preference as auser preference value from a user, wherein the user preference valueindicates a perceptual importance of visual quality of the region ofinterest from the perspective of the user.
 38. The computer-readablemedium of claim 27, wherein the encoded video frame is a first videoframe, the computer-readable medium further comprising instructions tocause the processor to encode a second video frame based on theallocation of encoding bits.
 39. A device comprising: means for defininga region of interest for an encoded video frame; and means forgenerating a quality metric for the encoded video frame containing theregion of interest based on video fidelity of a preceding frame,perceptual quality of the preceding frame, and user preference for theregion of interest, wherein means for obtaining the user preference as auser preference value from a user, wherein the user preference valueindicates a perceptual importance of visual quality of the region ofinterest from the perspective of the user and further comprising meansfor allocating encoding bits between the region of interest and areas ofthe video frame that are not within the region of interest based atleast in part on the quality metric.
 40. The device of claim 39, whereinthe perceptual quality includes a temporal quality value and a spatialquality value for the preceding frame.
 41. The device of claim 40,wherein the temporal quality value includes a first temporal qualityvalue for the region of interest, and a second temporal quality valuefor areas that are not within the region of interest.
 42. The device ofclaim 40, wherein the spatial quality value includes a first spatialquality value for the region of interest, and a second spatial qualityvalue for areas that are not within the region of interest.
 43. Thedevice of claim 40, wherein the spatial quality value is based at leastin part on presence of blocking artifacts in the preceding frame, andwherein the temporal quality value is based at least in part on presenceof temporal flicker artifacts in the preceding frame.
 44. The device ofclaim 39, wherein the video fidelity includes a distortion value basedat least in part on a peak signal to noise ratio for the preceding videoframe.
 45. The device of claim 39, wherein the encoded video frame is afirst video frame, the device further comprising means for encoding asecond video frame based on the allocated bits.
 46. The device of claim39, further comprising means for allocating rho domain values tomacroblocks within the frame based on a frame budget and a weightingbetween macroblocks within the region of interest and macroblocks withinareas of the video frame that are not within the region of interest, andmapping the rho domain values to corresponding quantization parameter(QP) values to allocate a number of encoding bits to each of themacroblocks.
 47. The device of claim 39, wherein the quality metriccomprises a rate budget specifying the number of encoding bits availablefor the video frame, and an indication of whether encoding of the areasthat are not within the region of interest will be skipped.
 48. Thedevice of claim 39, further comprising means for grouping successiveframes into frame unit, encoding regions of interest associated with therespective frames, and skipping encoding of areas that are not within arespective region of interest for at least one of the frames in theframe unit.
 49. The device of claim 39, further comprising means forselectivity skipping encoding of areas that are not within a respectiveregion of interest for at least one of the frames when a distortionvalue associated wilt a preceding frame unit is less than a thresholdvalue.